Lecture 2: Cm Types, Reflex Fields, and Main Theorem (2/22/12) Notes by I. Boreico

ثبت نشده
چکیده

Recall the setting at the end of the previous lecture: A is an abelian variety over a field F of characteristic zero, with dimension g > 0. Let L be a number field of degree 2g over Q “acting” on A; that is, we have an embedding L ↪→ End(A). The elements of L that actually act on A – i.e., O := L ⋂ End(A) – form an order in L. Since char(F ) = 0, the action of O on T0(A) (a g-dimensional F -vector space) induces an action of L = O ⊗Z Q on T0(A). This makes T0(A) into an F ⊗Q L-module (also F ⊗Q L = F ⊗Z O, so we can get this action by another way). Keep in mind that there are two actions of Q (or Z) on Te(A): one coming from the embedding of Q in End(A) and another coming from the F -vector space structure (as A is an F -scheme). These actions coincide since both respect the underlying abelian group structure and the Z-module structure on an abelian group is unique (so likewise for a Q-vector space structure over this). If F = C, then A is a quotient V/Λ where V is a g-dimensional C-vector space and Λ is a O-module that is isomorphic to Z. In general when g > 1 this is not an invertible O-module when O 6 = OL. (The case g = 1 is very misleading in this regard since invertibility does hold in such cases for any O, due in part to the fact that quadratic orders are monogenic; higher-degree orders usually are not monogenic.) However, H1(A(C),Q) = ΛQ = Λ ⊗Z Q is a 1-dimensional L-vector space. We try as much as possible to work in the isogeny category (or to pass to the case when the CM order is OL) so that we can sidestep the fact that the integral homology is usually not an invertible O-module when O 6 = OL. Observe that T0(A) = V = R ⊗Z Λ ' R ⊗Q ΛQ as R ⊗Q L-modules, so it is a free R ⊗Q Lmodule of rank 1. This description (involving only R-linear structures) does not take into account the complex structure from F = C; we would like to know the structure of V = T0(A) as a module over C ⊗Q L ' ∏

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Algebraic Formulation of the Main Theorem of Cm

The goal of this talk is to introduce the algebraic form of the Main Th’m of CM and show that it implies the "down to earth" form of the main th’m stated in Mike’s lecture. Along the way, we will introduce several important technical concepts used in the proof of the main theorem including Q-polarization and the reflex torus. We follow very closely the presentation given in Appendix A of the CM...

متن کامل

Research Summary

These notes are based on my Advancement to Candidacy Lecture Notes, given on Friday, May 27, 2016. I expect I will be expanding them in due time. My aim is to tackle some questions relating to the modular representation theory of symmetric groups. Sections 1 through 3 give some of the established results on the subject. Section 1 describes the CDE triangle associated to the modular representati...

متن کامل

Math 121 Notes: a Field Guide to Galois Theory

1. Vector Spaces: 1/7/13 1 2. Review of Math 120 I: Planting Seeds: 1/9/13 3 3. Review of Math 120 II: Harvesting Consequences: 1/11/13 4 4. Extending Fields by Adjoining Roots of Irreducible Polynomials: 1/14/13 5 5. Splitting Fields and Algebraic Closures: 1/16/13 6 6. Searching for Closure: 1/18/13 7 7. Separable Field Extensions: 1/23/13 9 8. Finite Fields and Roots of Unity: 1/25/13 10 9. ...

متن کامل

Main Theorem of Complex Multiplication

In [S, Ch. IV, §18] the Main Theorem of complex multiplication is proved in a manner that uses some adelic formalism. However, [S] uses a framework for algebraic geometry that has long been abandoned, so many of the beautiful ideas there are somewhat shrouded in mystery for the reader who is unfamiliar with the pre-Grothendieck approaches to algebraic geometry and abelian varieties. The aim of ...

متن کامل

Lecture notes on strongly minimal sets (and fields) with a generic automorphism

These lecture notes develop the theory of strongly minimal sets with a generic automorphism. They are strongly influenced by, and in some sense an exposition of the papers [1] and [2] which look at the case of algebraically closed fields with an automorphism. The deepest parts of these latter papers are concerned with dichotomy theorems (a type of SU -rank 1 is locally modular or nonorthogonal ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2012